Development of an Evaluation Method for Urban Water Network Sustainability Through the Innovation of a Point Sustainability Index: A Case Study of Abyek

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD Student of Water Resources, Deptartment of Civil Engineering, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associated Professor, Deptartment of Civil Engineering, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Designing programs for the rehabilitation and development of water distribution networks before any executive action, in order to avoid wasting costs, requires simulating the effect of executive options on the performance of the network. Performance of water distribution networks is evaluated based on the network risk index for current and the future situations of the network. Also, network performance is evaluated in time periods (daily, monthly, quarterly and yearly) to determine the sustainability of or compare homogeneous networks. It is necessary to pay attention to the evaluation of the local and point efficiency of the network and its relationship with the sustainability index. Therefore, current research was designed to carry out the mechanism of obtaining a point index as a new solution to show the effects of changes on consumption points.
In the implementation step, the hydraulic simulation of the real water distribution network in Abek Qazvin was carried out to extract the necessary data to implement the proposed method. Then the point indices of resilience, vulnerability and reliability were extracted from the overall index of the network in three modes of minimum, average and maximum consumption.
The distribution of point sustainability indices showed that more than half of the network nodes are in a relatively stable state; on the other hand, a significant part of the network nodes is in the relative sustainability range, and some of the network nodes are in the unstable range. Also, the results showed that in the maximum consumption mode, the distribution of point sustainability had lower values than other consumption modes, in such a way that the trend of changes in the overall index of the network decreased from 0.66 to 0.41 with the decrease in pressure. In the same situation simultaneously, the average point index of the network decreased from 0.8 to 0.27. Therefore, the comparison of the total and point sustainability indices of the network showed that the amount and distribution of the sustainability index of the network points have decreased more with the increase in consumption (pressure reduction) compared to the total index. As a result, the point sustainability index in the state of maximum consumption compared to the total sustainability index was a better indicator for network consumption nodes. Therefore, it can be recommended that in network rehabilitation and development programs, evaluation and promotion of point sustainability will provide more favorable operational results. For continuing and raising up the accuracy of current research outcomes, authors suggest to analyses both overall and points sustainability indices within three main conditions of the water network correspondence to periods of the 10 meters water pressures as these pressure classification seats the acceptable pressure situation in the network.
 

Keywords

Subjects


  • Ahmadi, N. A., Moradi, E., Hoseini, S. M., & Shahraki, A. S. (2022). Simulation of the dynamics of water resources in the Hirmand watershed under economic and environmental scenarios. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27, 15091–15117.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02713-9

  • Alamanos, A. (2021). Sustainable water resources management under water-scarce and limited-data conditions. Central Asian Journal of Water Research, 7(2), 1-19.

doi:10.29258/CAJWR/2021-R1.v7-2/1-19.eng.

  • Bakhtiari, S., Safavi, H., & GolMohammadi, M.H. (2016). Analysis and evaluation of the performance of water distribution networks using performance criteria and deterministic and fuzzy stability index (In Persian). Water and Wastewater Science and Engineering, 1(1), 28-36.

https://doi.org/10.22112/jwwse.2017.51051

  • Boltz, F., Poff, N. L., Folke, C., Kete, N., Brown, C. M., Freeman, S. S. G., Rockström, J. (2019). Water is a master variable: Solving for resilience in the modern era. Water Security, 8, 100048.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2019.100048

  • Borzì, I., Bonaccorso, B., & Aronica, G. T. (2018). Performance Analysis of the Water Distribution System of the City of Messina through Sustainability Indices. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Hydroinformatics,

https://www.iahr.org/library/infor?pid=17834

  • Butler, D., Ward, S., Sweetapple, C., Astaraie‐Imani, M., Diao, K., Farmani, R., & Fu, G. (2017). Reliable, resilient, and sustainable water management: the Safe & SuRe approach. Global Challenges, 1(1), 63-77.

https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.1010

  • Cassiolato, G., Carvalho, E. P., Caballero, J. A., & Ravagnani, M. A. (2021). Optimization of water distribution networks using a deterministic approach. Engineering Optimization, 53(1), 107-124.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2019.1702980

  • Creaco, E., & Haidar, H. (2019). Multiobjective optimization of control valve installation and DMA creation for reducing leakage in water distribution networks.  Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management,145(10).

https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001114

  • Dziedzic, R., & Karney, B. W. (2016). Performance index for water distribution networks under multiple loading conditions. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 142(1), 14.

https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000564

  • Enteshari, S., Safavi, H. R., & van der Zaag, P. (2020). Simulating the interactions between the water and the socio-economic system in a stressed endorheic basin. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 65(13), 2159-2174.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1802027

  • Ezzeldin, R. M., & Djebedjian, B. (2020). Optimal design of water distribution networks using whale optimization algorithm. Urban Water Journal, 17(1), 14-22.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2020.1734635

  • Ghafoori, S., Hassanpour Darvishi, H., Mohamadvali Samani, H., & Taherei Ghazvinei, P. (2021). Enhancing the method of decentralized multi-purpose reuse of wastewater in urban area. Sustainability, 13(24), 13553.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413553

  • Ghanooni, H. (2021). Introducing the four approaches to sustainable development and proposing a suitable scenario for the current conditions in Iran. Sustainable Urban Development, 2(5), 65-71.

https://doi.org/10.22034/usd.2021.696819

  • Golabchi, M., & SamaniMajd, A. M. (2021). Study on Environmental Sustainable Development Indices Based on Project Management PMBOK Standards (Case Study: Esfahan City) Urban Sustainable Development Journal, 2(2), 1-10.

https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.27170128.1400.2.2.1.4

  • Huizar, J., Luis, H., Kang, D., & Lansey, K. (2011). A decision support system for sustainable urban water supply. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress: Bearing Knowledge for Sustainability, Palm Springs, CA, United States.

https://doi.org/10.1061/41173(414)339

  • Kuma, T., & Abate, B. (2021). Evaluation of hydraulic performance of water distribution system for sustainable management. Water Resources Management, 35(15), 14.

http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-540541/v1

  • Macías Ávila, C. A., Sánchez-Romero, F.-J., López Jiménez, P. A., & Pérez-Sánchez, M. (2021). Leakage Management and Pipe System Efficiency. Its Influence in the Improvement of the Efficiency Indexes. Water, 13(14), 25.
  • Marques, J., & Cunha, M. (2020). Upgrading water distribution networks to work under uncertain conditions. Water Supply, 20(3), 878–888.

https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.011

  • Monsef, H., Naghashzadegan, M., Farmani, R., & Jamali, A. (2019). Deficiency of reliability indicators in water distribution networks. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 145(6), 04019022.

https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001053

  • Paez, D., & Filion, Y. (2017). Use of network theory and reliability indexes for the validation of synthetic water distribution systems case studies. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 24, 2-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2016.12.002

  • Prasad, R. K. (2021). Identification of Critical Pipes for Water Distribution Network Rehabilitation. Water Resources Management, 35(15), 5187–5204

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02994-1

  • Safavi, H. R., Golmohammadi, M. H., & Sandoval-Solis, S. (2016). Scenario analysis for integrated water resources planning and management under uncertainty in the Zayandehrud river basin. Journal of hydrology, 539, 625-639.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.073

  • Sanz Estapé, G. (2016). Demand modeling for water networks calibration and leak localization (Tesi doctoral). UPC, Institut d'Organització i Control de Sistemes Industrials.

http://dx.doi.org/10.5821/dissertation-2117-96319

  • Sanz, G., & Pérez, R. (2015). Sensitivity analysis for sampling design and demand calibration in water distribution networks using the singular value decomposition. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 141(10), 12.

https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000535

  • Vitan, E., Hotupan, A., & Hadarean, A. (2021). Average Operating Pressure Effect on Water Supply Systems Performances. A Case Study for 12 Romanian Small Water Distribution Networks. Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences, 11(2), 143-150.

https://doi.org/10.2478/jaes-2021-0019

  • Zischg, J., Mair, M., Rauch, W., & Sitzenfrei, R. (2017). Enabling efficient and sustainable transitions of water distribution systems under network structure uncertainty. Water, 9(9), 715.

https://doi.org/10.3390/w9090715