Reviewers
Peer Review Method of the Journal

The journal employs a Double-Blind Peer Review method. In this process:

  • The identities of the authors remain anonymous to the reviewers.
  • The identities of the reviewers are not disclosed to the authors.

This process is designed to ensure impartiality, enhance the quality of manuscript evaluation, and prevent any personal bias in the decision-making process. Authors are also requested not to include any information that could reveal their identity (such as names, institutional affiliations, or other identifying details) within the manuscript.


Commitments and Responsibilities of Reviewers

Confidentiality of Information:
Reviewers must uphold the confidentiality of all information about manuscripts throughout all stages of the peer review process. The review process must be conducted anonymously and confidentially.

Adherence to Deadlines:
Reviewers are expected to complete their evaluations of manuscripts within the designated timeframe and assist the editorial team in making decisions regarding the manuscript's acceptance or rejection.

Provision of Constructive Feedback:
Reviewers should provide constructive feedback and recommendations regarding the manuscript through the completion of the review form and offer comments and suggestions in the designated section for both the author and the editor.

Avoidance of Conflicts of Interest:
Reviewers must refrain from evaluating manuscripts that may have a conflict of interest. Any potential conflict of interest should be disclosed to the editorial team as soon as it is identified.

Expert and Impartial Judgment:
Reviewers are expected to assess the manuscript’s quality and content based on their expertise, maintaining objectivity and fairness in their evaluations.


Guide for Recording Peer Review Records in the Web of Science Database

To enhance and standardize the journal's peer review records, we kindly request that you send the link to your profile in the Web of Science database to the journal's editorial office.

If you have not yet registered in this database, you can create a user account by following the link below:

Link to Register in Web of Science

Additionally, we kindly ask that you forward the email confirming the completion of your review (which is sent to you after you finish the review) to the following email address:
reviews@webofscience.com

Please note that you can also register your previous peer review records in the Web of Science database via the email above.

Thank you for your valuable cooperation.