The Effectiveness of Higher Order Thinking Skills Training (HOTS)on Cognitive Processes and Design Product

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Considering the importance of the effect of cognitive education, facing these issues and concerns involves the mind of a designer or architect for education and related methods, because with the timely and balanced application of education It is possible to have creative people and successful designers, and this is absolutely necessary considering the speed of changes in education and educational environments. Training of Higher Order Thinking Skills based on metacognition and critical thinking is one of the trainings that process basic cognitive skills and help mental well-being. The purpose of this research was to investigate the effect of teaching Higher Order Thinking Skills on students' creativity, design product, and fluid intelligence. The question of the research is whether the teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills can have an effect on creativity in design and fluid intelligence of students. The purpose of this research was to investigate the effect of teaching Higher Order Thinking Skills on creativity in design and fluid intelligence of students. The present research method was semi-experimental with a pre-test-post-test design with a control group. Therefore, in the form of a pre-test-post-test semi-experimental design with a control group, he determined the effect of the Higher Order Thinking Skills educational model on the level of fluid intelligence and creativity in the design of architecture students. According to the purpose of the research, the statistical population in this research included all architecture students of Hamedan Azad University in the academic year (1400-1401). Based on the selection criteria, 30 people were selected as available and randomly replaced in two control and experimental groups (15 people in the experimental group and 15 people in the control group). The experimental group received 10 sessions of training, but the control group did not receive any training. In order to collect data, Cattell 's fluid intelligence, Torrance's creativity and researcher-made product valuation scale were used. According to the results of covariance analysis and the F value obtained in fluid intelligence (5.03), it can be said that the effect of Higher Order Thinking Skills training on students' fluid intelligence (with eta square - 16 percent effect) was significant. Training in creativity was significant with the obtained F value (18.91) and the impact rate (42%). Also, the F value obtained in the design product (31.61) was significant with the effect rate (55%). From the findings, it can be concluded that education helps to expand the range of knowledge and diversity in the understanding of concepts and content, and then it causes an increase in divergent thinking and the expansion of a person's knowledge. And this expansion of the student's knowledge and ability in classifying and comparing concepts with each other in the use of various symbols and images, causes him to avoid projecting unrelated ideas and deviant and different perceptions of the real meaning and to reread experiences. The former deals with the expansion of semantic memory. Also, education has been able to increase the student's information processing power in the ability to recognize relationships between visual stimuli, the speed of analyzing information, and the ability of active memory. Although having the power and skill of thinking, especially Higher Order Thinking Skills, is a category that can be increased under the influence of many factors, but the results of this research showed that the educational method can improve them by providing a suitable educational environment.
Keywords
Subjects

·     Abedi, J. (1993). Creativity؛ A new instrument for its assessment. Psychological research, 2 (1,2), 46-54.
·     Alipour, L. (2019). Improving Precedent-based architectural Design Ideation with Action research Methodology. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 24(3), 47-60.
·     Avsec, S., & Jagiello-Kowalczyk, M. (2021). Investigating Possibilities of Developing Self-Directed Learning in Architecture Student. Using Design Thinking. Sustainability, 13(8), 4369.
·     Azizzadeh, S., Liew, F., & Dandekar, N. (2013). Exploring the neural correlates of visual creativity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(6), 475-480.
·     Butler, A.G.; & Roberto, M.A. (2018). When cognition interferes with innovation: Overcoming cognitive obstacles to design thinking. Research Technology Management. 61, 45–51.
·     Bott, N., Quintina, EM. Saggar, M., Kienitz, E., Royaltyc, A., Wei-Chen Hong, D., Liua, N., hsuan Chiene, Y., Hawthornec, G., & Reiss, A. (2014). Creativity Training enhances goal-directed attention and information processing. Journal Thinking Skills and creativity, 13: 120-128.
·     Calaviaa, M. Belény; Blanco, Teresa; Casas, Roberto. (2021). Fostering creativity as a problem-solving competence through design: Think-Create-Learn, a tool for teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 39.
·     Chang, Y., Bei-DiLi, Chen, H.-C., & Chiu, F-C. (2015). investigating the synergy of critical thinking and creative thinking in the course of integrated activity in Taiwan, Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 35(3), 341-360.
·     Chen, Rowland; Dannenberg, Roger B; Raj, Bhiksha; Singh, Rita. (2020). Artificial Creative Intelligence: Breaking the Imitation Barrier.In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Creativity, Association for Computational Creativity.
·     Deary, I. J. (2014). Teaching intelligence. Intelligence, 42, 142-147.
·     DeBono, E. (1993). De Bono's Thinking Course. Tehran: Akhtaran.
·     Edwards, P.; Zhang, W.; Belton, B.; & Little, D.C. (2019). Misunderstandings, myths, and mantras in aquaculture: Its contribution to world food supplies has been systematically over reported. Marine Policy, 106, 103547.
·     Enayati, B., Gholmohammadnejhad Bahrami, G., & mesrabadi, J. (2017). Adaptation and standardization of Cattell Intelligence Test (Form B). Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 8(30), 151-164.
·     Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum; A vision. Topoi. 37(1):165-184.
·     Erfani, N. (2016). Developing Measurement Model of Cognitive and Metacognitive Learning Strategies. Research in School and Virtual Learning, 3(12), 7-16.
·     Fathi Azar, E., Adib, Y., Hashemi, T., Badri-gargari, R. & Gharibi, H. (2013). Effective of Strategic Training of Thinking on Critical Thinking in Students. Journal of Modern Psychological Researches, 8(29), 195-216.
·     Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Development Inquiry. Am. Psychol. 34, 906-911.
·     Hamzah, H., Hamzah, M. I., & Zulkifl, H. (2022). Systematic Literature Review on the Elements of Metacognition-Based Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Teaching and Learning Modules. Sustainability,14(2), 813.
·     Ibrahim, N.N., Ayub, A. F., & Yunus, A. S. (2020). Impact of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Module on the Cognitive Apprenticeship Model (CAM) on Students Performance. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research,19(7), 246-262.
·     Jamal, T.; Kircher, J.; & Donaldson, J.P. (2021). Re-Visiting Design Thinking for Learning and Practice: Critical Pedagogy, Conative Empathy. Sustainability, 13(2), 964.
·     Jamian, A.R.; Othman, S.; Azhar Md Sabil, J.M. (2016). Teacher’s Readiness in the Implementation of Thinking Skills towards Non-Malay Students’ Essay Writing. PENDETA J. Malay Lang. Educ. Lit.; 7, 1–8.
·     Jia, X.; Li, W.; & Cao, L. (2019). The role of metacognitive components in creative thinking. Front. Psychol, 10, 1-11.
·     Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5-14.
·     Jones T. (2017). Playing Detective to Enhance Critical Thinking. Teaching and Learning in Nursing; 12(1):73-76.
·     Kara, L. (2015). A critical look at the digital technologies in architectural education: when, where, and how? Ocedia Social and Behavioral Sciences .176, 526 – 530.
·     Karvan, F. (2023). Developing a Structural Model for Idea Generation in Architecture Education with Creativity Styles and Metacognitive Skills and the Mediating Role of Learning Strategies. Karafan Journal, 19(4), 111-134.
·     Karvan, F., Talischi, G., & haghtalab, T. (2020). The effectiveness of semantic – symbolic model on increasing power of visualization and cognitive intelligence of Architecture students. Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning7(13), 233-252.
·     Kavousi, S.; Miller, P.A.; & Alexander, P.A. (2020). Modeling metacognition in design thinking and design making. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 30, 709–735.
·     Lang, J. (1994). The Creation of Architectural Theory: The Role of Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. Tehran: University of Tehran.
·     Lawson, B. (2013). How Designers Think: Demystifying the Design Process. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University.
·     Leoplold, C. (2005). Geometry Education for Developing Spatial Visualisation Abilities of Engineering Students, The Journal of Polish Society for Geometry and Engineering Graphics, 15, 39-45.
·     Li, Ch.; Ren, X.; Schweizer, K.; & Wang, T. (2022). Fluid intelligence: A combined approach. Intelligence. 91, 101627.
·     Mahmoudi, S. A. S. (2002). Challenges of architectural design education in Iran: A study of the views of professors and students. Fine Arts, -(12), 70-79.
·     Mahmoudi, S.A.S. (2005). Design thinking the interactive model of thinking and design. Fine Arts, -(20), 27-36.
·     Mahzoonzadeh Bushehri, F. (2017). The relationship between students' problem-solving skills and creativity mediated by self-efficacy: Modelling structural equations. Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Human Science, 6(4), 27-50.
·     Martins, F.; Almeida, M.; Calili, R.; & Oliveira, A. (2020). Design Thinking Applied to Smart Home Projects: A User-Centric and Sustainable.Perspective. Sustainability,12(23), 10031.
·     Mattingly, A. (2011). Mind and Method: An Examination of Cognitive Activities in the Design Process (Unpublished master’s Thesis). Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
·     Mobasheri, F., Manoochehri, M., & Noruzi, F. (2017). Critical Thinking Skills among Bachelor Students at Fasa University of Medical Sciences. DSME, 4 (1), 4-15.
·     Murphy, D. H.; Agadzhanyan, K.; Whatley, M. C.; & Castel, A. D. (2021). Metacognition and fluid intelligence in value-directed remembering. Metacognition Learning. 16, 685–709.
·     Omidpoor, A., Kabini Moghadam, S., & Miyandehi, H. (2021). Evaluation of the effectiveness of problem-solving training on creativity and cognitive flexibility in teachers of work and technology. Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Human Science, 11(2), 101-120.
·     Perry, A., & Karpova, E. (2017). Efficacy of teaching creative thinking skills: A comparison of multiple creativity assessments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24(4), 118-126.
·     (Punnithann, S. (2018). Relationship between higher order thinking skills and metacognitive towards hands on teaching among primary science schoolteachers in jempol, Malaysia. Tesis dikemukakan kepada sekolah pengajian siswazah, Universiti Putra Malaysia Sebagai Memenuhi Keperiuan untuk ijazah master sains.
·     Pressman, A. (2012). Designing Architecture: The Elements of Process. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis, 2012.101-103.
·     Qing, Z., Jing, G., & Yan, W. (2010). Promoting preservice teachers’ critical thinking skills by inquiry-based chemical experiment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2(2) ‚ 4597-603.
·     Reyhani, E., Bakhshalizadeh, Sh., & Nazari, K. (2013). The Effect of Visualization-Based Teaching Approach on Understanding the Concept of Limit and the Spatial Ability Amongst High School Students. Advances in Cognitive Sciences, 15 (1), 27-42
·     Seif, A.A. (2016). Modern Educational Psychology; Psychology of Learning and Teaching. Tehran: Doran.
·     Slavin, R, E. (2006). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. (8th-ed). New York: Pearson.
·     Sokol, A. & ET. Al., Sonntag, M., & Khomenko., N. (2008). The Development of Inventive Thinking Skills in the Upper Secondary Language Classroom. Journal of thinking skills and creativity, 3(1), 34-46.
·     Souza, L., C, Volle, E., Bertoux, M., Czernecki, V., Funkiewiez, A., & Allali, G. (2010). Poor creativity in frontotemporal dementia: a window into the neural bases of the creative mind. Neuropsychologia, 48(13), 3733-3742.
·     Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Successful intelligence: A model for testing intelligence beyond IQ tests. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 8(2), 76-84.
·     Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 306–314.
·     Terlecki, M. S., Newcombe, N. S., & Little, M. (2008). Durable and generalized effects of spatial Experience on mental rotation. Applied cognitive psychology, 22(7), 996-1013.
·     Van Der Stel, M., & Veenman, MV. (2010). Development of metacognitive skillfulness: A longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences. 20(3):220-224.
·     Wilson, J. (2017). Critical thinking; A beginner's guide to critical thinking, better decision making and problem solving. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
·     Xinfa, Y., Jonathan, P., & Guo, J. (2015). Modeling influences on divergent thinking and artistic creativity. Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16. 62-68.
·     Zhou, Q. (2021). Development of creative thinking skills through aesthetic creativity in middle school educational music course. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 40(2):100825
·     Zohar, A. (2013). Challenges in wide scale implementation efforts to foster higher order thinking (HOT) in science education across a whole school system. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10,233-249.